Hi Aaron, Wow, I almost missed your post buried in the digest! Anyway, you are correct on all counts. To reduce negative camber, the bottom of the tire is pulled inward, same as AMG did on the original Hammer. The tie rod eccentrics must allow more adjustment but I don't know the specs. There's also a factory tie rod eccentric that allows more adjustment - it's buried in the EPC somewhere, the cost is quite high, and I don't know if it's any help without the camber adjustment anyway.
:-) -- Dave M. Boise, ID 1994 E500 - 95kmi (Q-ship) 1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline) > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:39:20 -0800 > From: Aaron Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] Photos of K-Mac rear camber kit > > Dave, > > I know I'm jumping into this topic a bit late. From what I see, the > KMAC bushings replace the inner bushing on the big spring link and the > bushing on the rear tie rod, correct? So to decrease negative camber, > adjustment of the eccentric bolts would pull the inner part of the > rear wheel *closer* to the car, wheras the Speedtek adjustable camber > arms push the top of the wheel *outward*? Do the KMAC eccentric bolts > for the tie rod offer a bigger range of adjustment compared to the > stock tie rod eccentrics? > > -Aaron > 1987 300D > 1987 300TD >
