That is just so weird, sure over here getting a temporary registration
for an un-registered car is a bit more complicated than buying a
registered car but quite do able with a visit to the car rego place.
Why would a state want to miss out on a few dollars (temp rego is
relatively expensive) and the end result being that a vehicle shipper
gets some business.
Hendrik
who lives in a civilised country with mostly sensible rules
On 09/04/12 01:04, Allan Streib wrote:
Dieselhead<126die...@gmail.com> writes:
Yeah, we have a coomerce clause in the constitution that is supposed
to stop such BS. But our legislators cant read, and the courts
believe they must look to foreign lawr to find direction (because they
can't read either.) The really like sure rea law, because they could
knock of f anyone they don't like under that.
I don't know of any state that would not honor the temporary
registration from another state.
The problem here is buying a car in another state, and neither state is
claiming to have a provision for temporary registration in such a case.
What you might need to be asking about is a "transport permit" or
some such, don't expect the BMV employees to suggest that as they are
not the most creative folk. Also don't expect them to know the rules,
if they are like the IRS there's a good chance they will answer
questions incorrectly.
Allan
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
