On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:39:27 -0600 Fmiser <fmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rick Knoble wrote: > > > > I was asking if you are sure you want to raise the size limit > > on attachments. Yourself, perhaps Mitch, and I think someone > > else (Jim C.?) have limited speeds on their Internet > > connection. I have pretty fast DSL, so I don't care so much > > about email attachment size. > > Ah! I understand now. *grin* That's part of why I picked > 200k. Bigger than tiny, but still small enough even I won't > complain.
Well, the discussion a few years ago that imposed the limit was because the attachments were downloaded automatically, every time. Nowadays, there is a link in the email and you can download it if you want. If you don't want, it doesn't have to be downloaded. So having a finite limit does make sense (Kaleb would be inconvenienced if someone sent a 95 megabyte file, like I used to be able to at the Lab), but it certainly does need to be more thank 40 kB. Kaleb, Philip's 200 kB limit makes a lot of sense. Can you change the limit from 40 kB to 200 kB? Thanks, Craig _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
