On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:47:09 -0400 Mitch Haley <m...@voyager.net> wrote:
> Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: > > Anybody got AT&T uverse? Apparently it is now available to my address > > and is quite is less than half the price I am paying for sat for a > > 24mb connection rather than the 12 I have now with limited data. When did this message come through? I still have not seen the original. > Rumor has it that their DNS server is a good bit of the problem, I've > got to get another router so I can try openDNS.org. (if you let the > AT&T modem/router handle the router functions, you'll find that most of > the settings are locked) Can you not tell your computer to use nameserver 208.67.222.222 # resolver1.opendns.com nameserver 208.67.220.220 # resolver2.opendns.com ? In Linux, all I do is change /etc/resolv.conf and I'm using different name servers. If you do it by IP and not by name, unless the router rejects DNS requests, I don't see why it would not work. Craig _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
