Don,
   
  I know its not a great comparison but my '96 Dodge Dakota doesn't use hardly 
any oil in 3,000 miles and its got over 180k miles. I've owned it for nearly 
130,000 of those.
  
It was leaking badly from the rear main seal (about a quart in 500 miles) until 
I switched to Mobil 1, that was around 60k ago. I never did replace the seal it 
just leaked less and less.
   
  -Curt
   
  Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:44:48 -0600
From: "Donald Snook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1990 300SEL  was:  I found a 126
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Really? Assuming this guy is telling the truth (I know that is a big
assumption) he says it does not use ANY oil in 3000 miles.  Could this
one be lucky?  Or is it just a matter of time?

 

Don Snook 


                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 01:07:43 2006
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.207])
        by server5.arterytc5.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EvlVf-00038g-I3
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:07:43 +0000
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s10so2945113wxc
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:07:41 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        
b=nweN3SWngmuVfXp1Ot7nNQl+0qBfctnWk4mFrD+2+W4od2cWj0IGbKnIxFUmpIEkpeYtl9aaJ+7VKujOgRBAGFiKvGJEnS/Cb7vuXwz0/+q3FnBennKZNbqiH5N3Z6L2/lIAbiEGeo3IzecYLmSiTbAwxXRpfSxQ7Z53HXFJm/g=
Received: by 10.70.38.19 with SMTP id l19mr4732438wxl;
        Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.42.15 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:07:41 -0800
From: Zeitgeist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Importing non-US car to the USA? (was: rodbender)
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes_striplin.net.striplin.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://striplin.net/pipermail/mercedes_striplin.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:07:43 -0000

Wonder if the W140 w/OM606 turbo was ever imported as a foreign
diplomat's personal vehicle.  That's the only manner in which I can
imagine one of those cars entering the country...at least until 25
years from their original build date, when they'll be legally open for
importation.

On 1/8/06, Dave M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Importing a car to the USA that was never originally sold here just
> about takes an act of Congress, or some sort of diplomatic powers.
> Usually it requires making the whole car meet DOT regs, which can be
> obscenely expensive. There are a few loopholes, but I think those are
> few and far between. For instance, if you are moving from another
> country to the USA permanently and want to bring your personal car
> over, I think that's possible. (??) Not many people would fall into
> that category, though.
>
> Believe me, I'd LOVE to find a way to get a W124 E60 AMG Limited
> across the pond, but it'd probably easier to import all the parts
> needed to build the car and then assemble it here - same with the
> W140.135 that has the 606 turbo motor. Stupid import laws! I wonder if
> that car was sold in Canada? It's marginally easier to get a Canadian
> car to the USA - I think. (???)
>
> +dm
>
> > ------------------------------
> > Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:29:53 -0700
> > From: Craig McCluskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?
> >
> > > Such a shame we never got the 180hp S300 with the turbo 606 motor ove=
r
> > > here. I'd be all over one of those!
> >
> > Any chance of importing one from wherever they were sold?
> >
> >
> > Craig
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.striplin.net
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net
>


--
Casey
Olympia, WA
Biodiesel: "I drive in a persistent vegetative state"
'87 300TD intercooler (211k)
'84 300D (207k)
Gashuffer:
'89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (186K)

Reply via email to