Dieselhead wrote: > One report put the cost at $677 million spent to develop the nonfunctioning > website. Given the population is about 318 million, that bungle by > O'bungler cost us each over $2million.
Umm... That type of new math is what cost ACA website its problems. I would have thought the Dr. would have caught that math error? Not $2million, but rather $2. Check the math. Andrew wrote: > And you will really enjoy this Tea Party parody video! Same math error happens in that video and the whole principle of ACA. Take the $$ for ACA and hand it over to the ones that *need* insco and everyone will be just fine. Take the 7million that *need* insco divided into the cost of the ACA website and each of those 7million could do quite well and leave the remainder of the 318million with their insco just fine, thank you very much. ACA is another taking, pure and simple. mao _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
