On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> People: > > This was supposed to be about Walmart not paying a "living wage", which > forces (some? Most? many?) of its "associates" to supplement their > earnings with public assistance. Aren't we promoting a kind of socialism > by redistributing our wealth so WM can maximize their profits? > Are you proposing price controls, then? If Wal-Mart has to pay their slaves more, they're just going to pass the costs on to the rest of us anyway with higher prices. Mandatory higher wages + mandatory lower prices = GUM Department Store in Moscow. Hardly a shining example. -MMM- _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
