This is an outstanding synthesis that seems well supported by facts.  It is
totally consistent with this old man's observations and life experience.  I
am surprised only by the source: NYT.  Both the information presented and
conclusions seem to conflict (rather violently) with the normal NYT
editorial bias.  

Thanks for sharing.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of
arche...@embarqmail.com
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: [MBZ] WHAT DRIVES SUCCESS IN AMERICA?


  What Drives Success?

A SEEMINGLY un-American fact about America today is that for some 
groups, much more than others, upward mobility and the American dream 
are alive and well. It may be taboo to say it, but certain ethnic, 
religious and national-origin groups are doing strikingly better than 
Americans overall.

Indian-Americans earn almost double the national figure (roughly $90,000 
per year in median household income versus $50,000). Iranian-, Lebanese- 
and Chinese-Americans are also top-earners. In the last 30 years, 
Mormons have become leaders of corporate America, holding top positions 
in many of America’s most recognizable companies. These facts don’t make 
some groups “better” than others, and material success cannot be equated 
with a well-lived life. But willful blindness to facts is never a good 
policy.

Jewish success is the most historically fraught and the most 
broad-based. Although Jews make up only about 2 percent of the United 
States’ adult population, they account for a third of the current 
Supreme Court; over two-thirds of Tony Award-winning lyricists and 
composers; and about a third of American Nobel laureates.

The most comforting explanation of these facts is that they are mere 
artifacts of class — rich parents passing on advantages to their 
children — or of immigrants arriving in this country with high skill and 
education levels. Important as these factors are, they explain only a 
small part of the picture.

Today’s wealthy Mormon businessmen often started from humble origins. 
Although India and China send the most immigrants to the United States 
through employment-based channels, almost half of all Indian immigrants 
and over half of Chinese immigrants do not enter the country under those 
criteria. Many are poor and poorly educated. Comprehensive data 
published by the Russell Sage Foundation in 2013 showed that the 
children of Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese immigrants experienced 
exceptional upward mobility regardless of their parents’ socioeconomic 
or educational background.

Take New York City’s selective public high schools like Stuyvesant and 
Bronx Science, which are major Ivy League feeders. For the 2013 school 
year, Stuyvesant High School offered admission, based solely on a 
standardized entrance exam, to nine black students, 24 Hispanics, 177 
whites and 620 Asians. Among the Asians of Chinese origin, many are the 
children of restaurant workers and other working-class immigrants.

Merely stating the fact that certain groups do better than others — as 
measured by income, test scores and so on — is enough to provoke a 
firestorm in America today, and even charges of racism. The irony is 
that the facts actually debunk racial stereotypes.

There are some black and Hispanic groups in America that far outperform 
some white and Asian groups. Immigrants from many West Indian and 
African countries, such as Jamaica, Ghana, and Haiti, are climbing 
America’s higher education ladder, but perhaps the most prominent are 
Nigerians. Nigerians make up less than 1 percent of the black population 
in the United States, yet in 2013 nearly one-quarter of the black 
students at Harvard Business School were of Nigerian ancestry; over a 
fourth of Nigerian-Americans have a graduate or professional degree, as 
compared with only about 11 percent of whites.

Cuban-Americans in Miami rose in one generation from widespread penury 
to relative affluence. By 1990, United States-born Cuban children — 
whose parents had arrived as exiles, many with practically nothing — 
were twice as likely as non-Hispanic whites to earn over $50,000 a year. 
All three Hispanic United States senators are Cuban-Americans.

Meanwhile, some Asian-American groups — Cambodian- and Hmong-Americans, 
for example — are among the poorest in the country, as are some 
predominantly white communities in central Appalachia.

MOST fundamentally, groups rise and fall over time. The fortunes of WASP 
elites have been declining for decades. In 1960, second-generation 
Greek-Americans reportedly had the second-highest income of any 
census-tracked group. Group success in America often tends to dissipate 
after two generations. Thus while Asian-American kids overall had SAT 
scores 143 points above average in 2012 — including a 63-point edge over 
whites — a 2005 study of over 20,000 adolescents found that 
third-generation Asian-American students performed no better 
academically than white students.

The fact that groups rise and fall this way punctures the whole idea of 
“model minorities” or that groups succeed because of innate, biological 
differences. Rather, there are cultural forces at work.

It turns out that for all their diversity, the strikingly successful 
groups in America today share three traits that, together, propel 
success. The first is a superiority complex — a deep-seated belief in 
their exceptionality. The second appears to be the opposite — 
insecurity, a feeling that you or what you’ve done is not good enough. 
The third is impulse control.

Any individual, from any background, can have what we call this Triple 
Package of traits. But research shows that some groups are instilling 
them more frequently than others, and that they are enjoying greater 
success.

It’s odd to think of people feeling simultaneously superior and 
insecure. Yet it’s precisely this unstable combination that generates 
drive: a chip on the shoulder, a goading need to prove oneself. Add 
impulse control — the ability to resist temptation — and the result is 
people who systematically sacrifice present gratification in pursuit of 
future attainment.

Ironically, each element of the Triple Package violates a core tenet of 
contemporary American thinking.

We know that group superiority claims are specious and dangerous, yet 
every one of America’s most successful groups tells itself that it’s 
exceptional in a deep sense. Mormons believe they are “gods in embryo” 
placed on earth to lead the world to salvation; they see themselves, in 
the historian Claudia L. Bushman’s words, as “an island of morality in a 
sea of moral decay.” Middle East experts and many Iranians explicitly 
refer to a Persian “superiority complex.” At their first Passover 
Seders, most Jewish children hear that Jews are the “chosen” people; 
later they may be taught that Jews are a moral people, a people of law 
and intellect, a people of survivors.

That insecurity should be a lever of success is another anathema in 
American culture. Feelings of inadequacy are cause for concern or even 
therapy; parents deliberately instilling insecurity in their children is 
almost unthinkable. Yet insecurity runs deep in every one of America’s 
rising groups; and consciously or unconsciously, they tend to instill it 
in their children.

A central finding in a study of more than 5,000 immigrants’ children led 
by the sociologist Rubén G. Rumbaut was how frequently the kids felt 
“motivated to achieve” because of an acute sense of obligation to redeem 
their parents’ sacrifices. Numerous studies, including in-depth field 
work conducted by the Harvard sociologist Vivian S. Louie, reveal 
Chinese immigrant parents frequently imposing exorbitant academic 
expectations on their children (“Why only a 99?”), making them feel that 
“family honor” depends on their success.

By contrast, white American parents have been found to be more focused 
on building children’s social skills and self-esteem. There’s an ocean 
of difference between “You’re amazing. Mommy and Daddy never want you to 
worry about a thing” and “If you don’t do well at school, you’ll let 
down the family and end up a bum on the streets.” In a study of 
thousands of high school students, Asian-American students reported the 
lowest self-esteem of any racial group, even as they racked up the 
highest grades.

Moreover, being an outsider in a society — and America’s most successful 
groups are all outsiders in one way or another — is a source of 
insecurity in itself. Immigrants worry about whether they can survive in 
a strange land, often communicating a sense of life’s precariousness to 
their children. Hence the common credo: They can take away your home or 
business, but never your education, so study harder. Newcomers and 
religious minorities may face derision or hostility. Cubans fleeing to 
Miami after Fidel Castro’s takeover reported seeing signs reading “No 
dogs, no Cubans” on apartment buildings. During the 2012 election cycle, 
Mormons had to hear Mitt Romney’s clean-cut sons described as “creepy” 
in the media. In combination with a superiority complex, the feeling of 
being underestimated or scorned can be a powerful motivator.

Finally, impulse control runs against the grain of contemporary culture 
as well. Countless books and feel-good movies extol the virtue of living 
in the here and now, and people who control their impulses don’t live in 
the moment. The dominant culture is fearful of spoiling children’s 
happiness with excessive restraints or demands. By contrast, every one 
of America’s most successful groups takes a very different view of 
childhood, inculcating habits of discipline from a very early age — or 
at least they did so when they were on the rise.

In isolation, each of these three qualities would be insufficient. 
Alone, a superiority complex is a recipe for complacency; mere 
insecurity could be crippling; impulse control can produce asceticism. 
Only in combination do these qualities generate drive and what 
Tocqueville called the “longing to rise.”

Needless to say, high-achieving groups don’t instill these qualities in 
all their members. They don’t have to. A culture producing, say, four 
high achievers out of 10 would attain wildly disproportionate success if 
the surrounding average was one out of 20.

But this success comes at a price. Each of the three traits has its own 
pathologies. Impulse control can undercut the ability to experience 
beauty, tranquillity and spontaneous joy. Insecure people feel like 
they’re never good enough. “I grew up thinking that I would never, ever 
please my parents,” recalls the novelist Amy Tan. “It’s a horrible 
feeling.” Recent studies suggest that Asian-American youth have greater 
rates of stress (but, despite media reports to the contrary, lower rates 
of suicide).

A superiority complex can be even more invidious. Group supremacy claims 
have been a source of oppression, war and genocide throughout history. 
To be sure, a group superiority complex somehow feels less ugly when 
it’s used by an outsider minority as an armor against majority 
prejudices and hostility, but ethnic pride or religious zeal can turn 
all too easily into intolerance of its own.

Even when it functions relatively benignly as an engine of success, the 
combination of these three traits can still be imprisoning — precisely 
because of the kind of success it tends to promote. Individuals striving 
for material success can easily become too focused on prestige and 
money, too concerned with external measures of their own worth.

It’s not easy for minority groups in America to maintain a superiority 
complex. For most of its history, America did pretty much everything a 
country could to impose a narrative of inferiority on its nonwhite 
minorities and especially its black population. Over and over, 
African-Americans have fought back against this narrative, but its 
legacy persists.

Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld are professors at Yale Law School and the 
authors of the forthcoming book “The Triple Package: How Three Unlikely 
Traits Explain the Rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in America.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/opinion/sunday/what-drives-success.html?nl
=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140126&_r=1
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to