Clay, I think you have "Nailed it' ... hahahahahahahahah.. Thanks,, best and most stress relief I've had in political discussion in months..
It would completely cure the re-election problem.... wouldn't it.. elegant and simple... just hammer the bastards to death... how satisfying, considering the current popularity enjoyed by congress, that just might come to pass.. Let them eat cake... On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:03 PM, clay <redgh...@comcast.net> wrote: > Another way to stabilize the excesses of government would be to make > running for office a terminal proposition. If you run for office and win, > then you will have two terms in which to play that game. At the end of > your short career, you are given a low key send off. A bottle of your > favored booze, a rub and tug, and then your constituents are given hammers > and you are retired. > > Bureaucrats can get the same sort of treatment. If you go looking for > the job, you will be paid a reasonable salary. If you rise through the > ranks into management and have a higher position, we get to use smaller > hammers. This allows you a longer moment to reflect upon your glorious > service. > > Those poor souls who are thrust into the positions of leadership against > their wills will be able to leave after the crisis is past. The sooner you > get the task done, the less likely you will be given a hero's send off. > > > On Jan 28, 2014, at 4:33 AM, Larry T wrote: > > > Yeah, I think you're right - 99.9% of the politicians are the same - > they are in it for themselves IMO. I believe T Cruz and M Lee are the > exceptions but these guys (meaning politicians in general) change their > stripes at the drop of a hat (or dollar bill) - but I think the media is > much to blame - after all, who would put themselves through the spotlight > of running a big campaign - where only one will get their moneys worth for > spending millions on a campaign. The others are left to pay their bills > somehow and find another job. Those potential money problems added to the > media going through your garbage looking for something bad they can scream > from the headlines. And it doesn't have to be true - a front page headline > today or a back page retraction needing a magnifying glass to read. Which > one will be remembered? > > > > We all have things in our past we'd prefer not to see on tomorrows 6 > O'Clock News. Sadly, a lot of politicians have criminal pasts and STILL > get elected/re-elected. Shows low expectations in our politicians it > seems... > > > > Sincerely, > > Larry > > > > On 1/27/2014 9:00 PM, Mountain Man wrote: > >> Larry wrote: > >>> The republicans are not falling for it at this time - but we don't > know what > >>> they're doing behind the scenes. > >> I will hi-jack your comments to state politics - IL. > >> It turns out that the one republican out of 4 in the primary that > >> interests me, come to find out, is probably a D in R clothes. He > >> touts he is not career politician which sounds good, but gives > >> millions in investments to D mayor of the city - yes, ChiTown - mayor > >> was former chief of staff for the prez. Go figure. Dem in Rep > >> clothes, or career politician. How is there a choice today in > >> politics? Why vote? There is zero choice - it is all crooks. Vote > >> is complete fraud. > >> mao > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
