On 3/26/2014 1:01 PM, Dieselhead wrote:
___________________
I wish we could do controlled burns, but I don't think you could do
it in a large wooded subdivision of mostly one to five acre lots and
a lot of standing dead trees on lots that don't have houses. I
would guess that not more than one fourth of the lots have houses,
and most of the remaing undeveloped lots are being held for
investment and/or sale at very high prices. I don't believe the
homeowners association could legally force the undeveloped lot
owners to keep their wooded lots clear of underbrush. I keep my
wooded lot clear of underbrush but many don't.
Gerry
Dieselhead wrote:
The HOA where my daughter lives managed to force one lot owner to go in
and clean out dead wood and underbrush. Different state, but i think if
the HOA was aggressive, they could do it.
That would solve the problem, but there is so much of the undeveloped
parts owned by people up north; not to mention the huge areas that
belong to Prudential Insurance, it would be something of a nightmare
trying to get everyone to comply.
Gerry
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list
owner has no control over the content of the messages of each
contributor.
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
