>So how many years of data would you like before you're persuaded we have a >problem, (Andrew?) > > How old is the planet? What this list should be doing instead of debating global warmings existence, is to start thinking about workable solutions in case there is such a thing as global warming and its effects are as predicted. The first thing to do is eliminate the proposed solutions that cannot be done such as as reducing pollution by significantly restricting the use of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels have been the basis of mankinds progress since the beginning of the industrial age about 200 years ago and there are no energy sources that can effectively replace them now. Solar energy is obviously the best hope. If every DIYer on this list put some sort of solar panel on his roof; no matter how small; it would be a start. The longest journey begins with one step. Gerry
> > USE a SPC control chart and do the math correctly. the numbers will > tell us how much data we need to bring the control levels into > acceptable levels. WHat level do you want? 6 sigma? 4? 2 sigma? > > Based on what the darwinist "science" tells us, the earf is millions > of years old. so it would probably take hundreds of thousands of > years of data to produce a good control chart. > > Personally, I'd guess if you had 10,000 years data, that would > probably suffice. 200 to 300 years data we have is but a blip in > time. It is insufficient to establish meaningful control limits. > > Read Walter Shewhart's book. Curly > _______________________________________ _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: https://server.secureplusplusfour.net:2083/cpsess595060604/3rdparty/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
