Thanks, Greg.  I’m looking forward on some fun at the range with this as well 
as learning how to properly and safely load it.

As I understand, one in the chamber, an empty chamber, then four more?

I have an excellent RSO that I’ll have walk me through it, too.

-D

> On Jun 11, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Greg Fiorentino via Mercedes 
> <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> 
> The revolver is indeed intended to fire two different rounds of slightly 
> different bullet diameter. And it was not the only one. There was also a 
> .357/9mm (.355) revolver with interchangeable cylinders. Not the best for top 
> target accuracy, but it kinda works, and is perfectly safe.
> 
> Congrats to Dan on a collectible and fun acquisition!
> 
> Greg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Meade 
> Dillon via Mercedes
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 7:29 AM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Cc: Meade Dillon
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT - Today's Fun
> 
> I think you mean something other than 22 magnum, I think that .22 magnum a
> slightly larger caliber than .22LR so you'd also need a larger diameter
> barrel.
> 
> Regardless, nice looking pistol and a great option for learning to safely
> and accurately handle such.
> 
> -------------
> Max
> Charleston SC
> 
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Dan--- via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com
>> wrote:
> 
>> The provenance on this model gun is actually pretty cool.
>> 
>> Apparently, with the popularity of Westerns at the time, Ruger decided it
>> would be smart marketing to put out a “six shooter” for the masses. There
>> were a number of different models, with barrel lengths up to 9” and
>> “convertibles” that had an additional cylinder that allowed the owner to
>> shoot .22 magnum bullets as well.
>> 
>> The distinction between models as they aged seems to be the “three screw”
>> identifier that applies to revolvers made before the late 60s/early 70s,
>> when Ruger redesigned the action and added a stop bar for safety purposes.
>> 
>> You can still send your Super Single Six in to Ruger to be updated, but
>> I’ve found that the three screw unmodified models are more valuable, so
>> mine will stay that way and I’ll be careful to load only five at a time so
>> there’s nothing “in the pipe” so to speak.
>> 
>> I’ve also found that Ruger will not sell parts without a serial number,
>> and if it comes back as an unmodified model they will not sell you parts
>> without having the revolver back and updating it.
>> 
>> Meh. There’s always Brownell’s.
>> 
>> -D
>> 
>>> On Jun 11, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nice, I have its BIG brother in .44 Mag. I inherited it from a great
>> uncle, never have shot it though. With the 10" barrel recoil shouldn't be
>> too bad but I suspect if I wanted to shoot it much I'd want to hand load...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Curt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018, 9:57:48 PM EDT, Dan Penoff via Mercedes <
>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For whatever reason, the Okie listserve strips my attachments out, no
>> matter how small.  Maybe some day the administrator can get that “feature”
>> sorted out.
>>> 
>>> http://penoff.com/photodump.html <http://penoff.com/photodump.html>
>>> 
>>> -D
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 10, 2018, at 9:44 PM, Craig via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:04:44 -0400 Dan Penoff via Mercedes
>>>> <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> After enjoying my Marlin 60 rifle so much, I started looking for
>>>>> a .22LR pistol/revolver.  I really didn’t want to drop the kind of coin
>>>>> necessary for like a Ruger Mark 4 or such, so I started looking at
>>>>> vintage revolvers.  Ended up buying a 1966 Ruger Super Single Six three
>>>>> screw model:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Won’t have time to get to the range today, so I’ll have to put it in
>>>>> the safe until later in the week when I can get out there…
>>>> 
>>>> Was there supposed to be a picture attached in the blank lines in
>> between
>>>> your two paragraphs, Dan?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Craig
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________
>>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>>> 
>>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>>> 
>>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________
>>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to