I agree with Max. Form follows function. However 100K plus for a
4x4 is stupid. 4x4s have gone off the rails since GM chopped off a
pickup and tried to pass it off as a 4x4. Ford fatso continued the
problem. (as did the dogde rumchugger)
These are examples of what a 4x4 should look like:
https://classics.autotrader.com/classic-cars/1962/international_harvester/scout/101214337
Or
https://classics.autotrader.com/classic-cars/1967/land_rover/series_ii/101204715
or
http://topclassiccarsforsale.com/ford/506806-1966-ford-bronco-u14-u100-half-cab-pickup-4x4-steel-hardtop-4wd-suv-bimini-top.html
Or
https://classics.autotrader.com/classic-cars/1960/ford/f100/100987993
Or
http://www.m201.com/bantam.htm
Oh! And I forgot the Dogde Power wagon of the 40s -60s and the WC3
made in WWII seen here
https://www.usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/Chrysler/dodge-trucks.htm
(Scroll down)
And, if you need something heavier, the IH R series 6x6 (or 10x10)
Max Dillon via Mercedes wrote on 10/18/19 6:35 PM:
And I like the looks. Serious, all business, ugly like a real truck should look.
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
