That was my initial thought also. I think gen IV reactors may produce more energy :-).
Let's get REAL. Wind nor solar will replace fossil fuel. Greg > On 2022-11-05 14:42, Allan Streib via Mercedes wrote: >> >> Though they are lighter and cheaper, they are less efficient at >> capturing wind energy than traditional blade designs. > > That makes sense. > The earlier link claiming 40% efficiency for turbines and 60% efficiency > for phallic monuments didn't pass my initial smell test, but I was > speaking from a point of total ignorance about the phallus design. > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
