I ran into that with the 99E320, ordered one and it didn’t fit so dug into it 
and found the serial number aspect. Got the right one and all was good 

--FT
Sent from iFōn

> On Jan 28, 2024, at 3:26 PM, dan penoff.com via Mercedes 
> <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> 
> Swapped out the offending part this afternoon, which took all of maybe 10 
> minutes, if that. I’ve done plenty of these in the past, but this one was the 
> worst due to one of the connector release tabs being right up against the 
> back of the block.
> 
> Beware if you are a W210 owner: There are at least two different CPS’ used by 
> Mercedes with the M112/W210, and pre-facelift, with a serial number break 
> based on engine number, have a different CPS than later models. That said, 
> they look identical on the outside, but the inside of the connector housing 
> on the CPS is different, that is, they are “keyed” differently inside:
> 
> 
> [CPS Early.jpg]
> 
> 
> If you look closely, you’ll see three “keys” inside the connector hood. The 
> arrangement of these keys determines whether it is the “early” or “late” CPS. 
> The part number for the early CPS (the one shown here) is 003-153-96-28. I 
> believe the later part is a 003-153-28-28, but always verify with the EPC or 
> a trusted parts supplier before ordering using your VIN. The later part is 
> keyed similarly, but the keys are in a mirror image to the early part, that 
> is, their orientation is reversed. I’ve kept the later part on the shelf with 
> several M112-powered cars in the fleet, not realizing there were variants.
> 
> I would be willing to bet that in a pinch either would work after you cut or 
> scraped the keys out of the connector hood or just cut it off completely (not 
> advised.)
> 
> As for the post-mortem, this is what we found:
> 
> The CPS installed in the car was an OE part but was not original. I say that 
> because someone took the trouble to schmear (and yes, that’s a technical term 
> as you’ll soon discover) anit-seize on the barrel of the CPS. I used the term 
> “schmear” because the amount of anti-seize they used was, to put it bluntly, 
> excessive. These are held and centered in the bore drilled into the bell 
> housing with three small ribs that are molded into the case of the part. The 
> barrel of the CPS never touches the bore. Worse, upon closer inspection, as 
> one would expect, the anti-seize, which as we all know is mostly grease with 
> aluminum powder mixed into it among other things, had leaked down the length 
> of the CPS, covering the end and no doubt dripping into the bell housing and 
> onto the flywheel.
> 
> Being very familiar with similar devices used for monitoring speed on 
> industrial engines, I would point out that any foreign material on the end of 
> the CPS is a Bad Thing, Even Worse when it's something metallic, even 
> aluminum. Essentially, that mess on the end of the CPS “shorts” out the 
> magnetic circuit that the CPS uses to work, either disabling it or making the 
> signal marginal or intermittent.
> 
> I suspect this was the issue with this failure. Interestingly, it never 
> occurred a second time. That and it failed late at night on a cold evening 
> after the car had been parked for several hours, so it certainly wasn’t heat 
> that caused the failure, which is what I have experienced with these failures 
> in the past.
> 
> Finally, to give you an idea of how critical the signal this device provides 
> is, my son reports that it drives like a different vehicle. He said the 
> engine runs smoother, shifts are crisper and timely, where they had been 
> occasionally wonky, and in general, the car just runs better. While I’m sure 
> there’s some placebo effect here, I believe him in what he describes. I have 
> to believe all the crud on the end of the CPS was seriously degrading its 
> output.
> 
> While I wouldn’t use my findings as a determination for the CPS to be 
> replaced regularly, it can’t hurt to pull it and inspect the end to make sure 
> it’s clean. That was an inspection item for an industrial engine when I 
> worked on them. Why? Because something as simple as a shaving from a flywheel 
> tooth when it meshes with the starter Bendix could short out a CPS - and that 
> metal core in the center of it *is* magnetic!
> 
> And now to the front brakes on the 2003 E320...
> 
> -D
> 
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to