In general I prefer ascending fuel economy, rather than descending...it's a play on words.
On 10/9/06, Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What fuel economy are you talking? I believe the 603 will out perform the 617 in fuel economy. Plus, this car has the added benefit of more leg room for the rear seat AND the reclining rear seat for extra passenger comfort..... -- Luther KB5QHU Alma, Ark '83 300SD (236 kmi) '82 300CD (160 kmi) '82 300D (74 kmi) needs MAJOR work Quoting Zeitgeist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think I'd personally prefer ascent fuel economy, but to each their own... > > On 10/9/06, Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I am old enough to know that the 126 is probably the best long distance >> road car >> ever made. Add a good 603 to that and you have a powerful car that get's >> descent fuel economy. _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
-- Casey Olympia, WA Biodiesel: "I drive in a persistent vegetative state" '87 300TD intercooler #22 (218k) '84 300D (216k) Gashuffer: '89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (187K) http://users.zhonka.net/zeitgeist/Misc/IMG_0171.JPG
