I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person!
At 04:46 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
Michael Baker wrote:
> David,
> I must have made some sense to you as you only objection is
> semantics. However, there's no confusion here. Climate is merely the
> tapestry woven by every day's weather. If one is predicting climate
> then one is merely predicting what the weather will be like over a
> period of time.
>
Not at all. Climate is a long term average over a wide area, and tends
to be predictable, whereas day-to-day weather for any given location is
chaotic. I point this out because the fact that you don't understand it
to me means all your other rationalizations are suspect.
To use an automotive example, I can say with pretty high certainty that
if I average the fuel economy of my Ford over an entire year, it will
get very close to 20 mpg. However, if I try to specify what my fuel
economy for any given day is, I could be way off, because I might get
stuck in a traffic jam and spend a lot of time idling.
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Michael Baker
Marketing Consulting & Communications
P. O. Box 1615
Running Springs, CA 92382-1615
909-867-5960
www.idm-marketing.com
