It seems than at Thu, 17 May 2007 06:56:17 -0400, Dwight wrote: > Wrong-you might be talking about RI when you say that. > Dwight
> On Behalf Of Mike Canfield > Wow......I didn't even know MA was big enough to have so many different > names for parts of it.......;>) > > Mike > From: "Frederick Moir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hey, Dwight. > > I'm not so parochial as to think Western Massachusetts starts at 128. > > 495 maybe. While MA is not as small as RI, compared to many of the states further west, it doesn't seem big enough for lots of sub-regions. In another posting, Dwight wrote: > OK-Fred, > You pass. Bad attempt at humour on my part. > WE can do a MB listers map of NE prior to our summer gathering. I don't think there are enough listers in Nebraska to bother trying to map them.... *smile* And in regards to size, NE's _short_ dimension is about the same as MA _long_ dimension. But I'm not from TX, so I don't necessarily thing that big is better - why, just a quick look at CA is pretty convincing!! -- Philip, stirring up trouble!
