Your comments are right on.  People do want to help, and in my opinion much
of my job was trying to put faces and personal stories to the headlines and
lesser known situations around the world.  My frustration is that often
'wanting to help' means cleaning out the junk in the closet and garage and
sending it to someone who doesn't need it, can't use it, costs more to ship
than it is worth, or which harms the locals more than it helps. People then
feel like something good has been done for those in need.  There is no other
way to say it - cash is the biggest help. Just do your homework and send it
to a decent charity that is careful about overhead and how it helps folks.
http://charitynavigator.org is one site that can help with that. The
accepted rule is 35% max overhead, but personally I'd stick to around 20%
overhead before I am willing to contribute. One of my friends heard a
director of an international aid group who thought it helpful that the
people they sent didn't speak the language as that would stop them from
being influenced by the locals.  Absurd. Your church is the largest of the
36 denominations that make up Church World Service [Gee - you helped pay my
salary!] The horror stories have not come from your giving through your
church, especially that part that went to CWS. Just about all of our foreign
staff are native to the countries we work in and have the contacts and
background to know what people need and how to get assistance where it is
needed. That matters. During the days Afghanistan was controlled by the
Taliban CWS had schools for girls and Taliban approved health clinics for
women because our staff were locals and not an 'outside' group coming in.
        As far as overhead let's start from the other end of things:  if you
want almost zero overhead drive to a poor area and hand your money to
someone who looks like they need it.  Overhead is the cost of fuel. If you
want people who have spent their lives working to help others and who have
college loans to pay off and kids to feed then some reasonable salaries are
to be expected.  Expertise costs - but not as much as trying to get the job
done with untrained help. I'd mention Iraq as an example of that. The half
million $ salaries and fancy parties that some organizations are known for
don't happen in the responsible ones.  One of the  things I appreciated
about my organization was how flat the salary ranges were.  Our regional
director made a bit more than I did, and the director of our international
organization [based in New York] made less than twice what I did.  It is
still expensive to have an organization that covers most of the globe,
though.  BTW, the lowest overhead is still the nuns who do charity work, of
course.  Can't beat them at that.
        Those flood relief kits are probably designed from a CWS kit
brochure - and we send kits all over the world [but not the ones with the
mops...],  and the donor is paying for the shipping.  I have been in some
pretty backwater places and seen health and personal kits stockpiled for
emergencies.  Honestly, a lot of what it does is let people have a 'hands
on' experience that is important to them.  Disaster / flood relief cleanup
kits are difficult and expensive to ship, and with most of the kits there is
a note that says what the value of the kit is and gives an option to send
that $ instead so supplies can be purchased locally.   
        Obviously a topic I could go on about for some time, but probably
already enough for this forum.
BillR        

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Wonko the Sane
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:45 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Parkersburg IA tornado pics - and a long soapbox rant

On a more serious note, I think that when a disaster hits (anywhere) folks
want to help but simply don't know how to. Some of the issues you mentioned
are nothing more than the result of well intentioned groups and individuals
grasping at straws to do *something*.

You mentioned having a garage sale and sending money. But to whom do you
send the money? Some are reluctant to send money because it is unknown
(unless one takes the time to do the research) how much of that money
actually gets to those in need and how much is siphoned off as overhead.

Sending stuff, even the wrong stuff, is just a gut reaction to a feeling of
helplessness on the part of the well-meaning. It isn't that we don't CARE
(pun intended) -- we want to SAVE THE CHILDREN.

Our local church as been assembling flood relief kits (it must be a
Methodist thing -- deathly afraid of water at the time of baptism (use the
minimum wetness possible) and that carries through even to social and
charitable projects) and I swear that half of the stuff included would be
worthless to someone who is suddenly homeless and jobless.
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to