On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Matt Harbison <mharbiso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017 03:02:42 -0400, Gregory Szorc <gregory.sz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > # HG changeset patch >> # User Gregory Szorc <gregory.sz...@gmail.com> >> # Date 1494485377 25200 >> # Wed May 10 23:49:37 2017 -0700 >> # Node ID fc01a88a85d64a3a440971c5e3b6c8f7db030170 >> # Parent 1ada3d18e7fbc9069910f2c036992d2f2b28e058 >> sslutil: tweak the legacy [hostfingerprints] warning message >> >> Lars Rohwedder noted in issue5559 that the previous wording was >> confusing. I agree. >> >> diff --git a/mercurial/sslutil.py b/mercurial/sslutil.py >> --- a/mercurial/sslutil.py >> +++ b/mercurial/sslutil.py >> @@ -820,13 +820,11 @@ def validatesocket(sock): >> if settings['legacyfingerprint']: >> ui.warn(_('(SHA-1 fingerprint for %s found in legacy >> ' >> '[hostfingerprints] section; ' >> - 'if you trust this fingerprint, set the ' >> - 'following config value in [hostsecurity] >> and ' >> - 'remove the old one from >> [hostfingerprints] ' >> - 'to upgrade to a more secure SHA-256 ' >> - 'fingerprint: ' >> - '%s.fingerprints=%s)\n') % ( >> - host, host, nicefingerprint)) >> + 'if you trust this fingerprint, remove the >> old ' >> + 'SHA-1 fingerprint from [hostfingerprints] >> and ' >> + 'add the following entry to the new ' >> + '[hostsecurity] section: >> %s.fingerprints=%s)\n') % >> + (host, host, nicefingerprint)) >> return >> # Pinned fingerprint didn't match. This is a fatal error. >> > > I'm guessing it's because stable hasn't been merged since 5559, but > s/%s.fingerprints/%s:fingerprints/ ? > I'll send a v2.
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel