On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 16:08 -0400, Augie Fackler wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2017, at 15:47, Phillip Cohen <phil...@phillip.io> > > wrote: > > > > Great, glad there's interest. > > > > How would Thursday at 10am PST / 1pm EST / 6pm UTC work? This is > > early enough for London to join, but not too early that California > > won't. Friday mornings are less desirable (because that's Friday > > evening in London) but Monday and Tuesday morning could work as > > well. > > I can't do 1300-1500 America/New_York on Thursdays. Pretty much any > other time in the week would work. Maybe shoot for Tuesdays? >
I'm also interested, 6pm UTC (5pm or 7pm could works too) on every day except Tuesdays would works for me with a preference for Thursday. > > > > > I'm happy to try and join. I've considered having VC-available > > > "office > > > hours" that people could use to get help on patches, debugging, > > > whatever. If there's interest in that I can try and pick a time. > > > > +1. Individual office hours are a great idea in their own right. > > > > > perhaps to start with > > > we could try and reach out to known contributors that might miss > > > this > > > kind of thing on the list? > > > > Sure, I'll start a wiki page so it could be sent to non-list- > > readers. > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Sean Farley <s...@farley.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > Durham Goode <dur...@fb.com> writes: > > > > > > > On 7/11/17 7:09 AM, Augie Fackler wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:42:48PM +0000, Phil Cohen wrote: > > > > > > Many of us enjoy the fast-paced collaboration that happens > > > > > > during Mercurial's sprints. Alas, they only happen twice a > > > > > > year. In the interim, many of us have used ad-hoc > > > > > > videoconferencing to whiteboard ideas ahead of code review, > > > > > > and this has worked pretty well. It'd be great to do even > > > > > > more here. > > > > > > > > > > > > One thing that was suggested in the last group get-together > > > > > > was to establish a regular time for community members to > > > > > > “hang out” on VC if they're available, and discuss any > > > > > > technical topics or proposals that come up. The goal is for > > > > > > this to be informal, replicating the sprint atmosphere as > > > > > > much as possible, so there'd be no need for a strict agenda > > > > > > (though we could create one if there's sufficient demand > > > > > > for topics). If nobody ends up wanting to talk about > > > > > > anything (a remote scenario, perhaps :) we can always end > > > > > > early. > > > > > > > > > > > > These video chat sessions should hopefully fill a niche > > > > > > that's poorly satisfied by IRC or e-mail today: discussing > > > > > > topics in-depth at high bandwidth before patches hit the > > > > > > mailing list. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this sound like something people would want to > > > > > > participate in? If so, we should hash out a good time > > > > > > (spitballing: Friday mornings? One problem is between US, > > > > > > Europe, and Japan, you can only ever pick satisfactory > > > > > > times for two of the three), frequency (fortnightly?), and > > > > > > videochat platform (Augie and I have used https://urldefens > > > > > > e.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > > > > > > 3A__appear.in&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=nuarHzhP1 > > > > > > wi1T9iURRCj1A&m=_T5aO7D7rY_Z7ImHZYBM5Fgrqdmamr3GPqHqFthl- > > > > > > 2A&s=Kafrn1OKTr8b6_4cLyRGdi8rogXB8ypSEfpqjp-LlPU&e= before > > > > > > and it seems to work well). > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to try and join. I've considered having VC- > > > > > available "office > > > > > hours" that people could use to get help on patches, > > > > > debugging, > > > > > whatever. If there's interest in that I can try and pick a > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > > > Also happy to just casually hang out on VC once every couple > > > > > of weeks. > > > > > > > > I'm all for it. I think it would help keep things unblocked > > > > and the > > > > sprint discussions tend to motivate people so perhaps regular > > > > discussions would help keep the motivation flowing. > > > > > > > > We have plenty of topics going around these days: > > > > > > > > - phabricator > > > > - sparse > > > > - obsstore > > > > - upstreaming other extensions > > > > > > > > to name a few > > > > > > I, too, am all for it. If for nothing else than to help convey > > > tone / > > > feeling which text cannot do. > > > > > > I'd be up for helping to get this going as well; perhaps to start > > > with > > > we could try and reach out to known contributors that might miss > > > this > > > kind of thing on the list? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mercurial-devel mailing list > > > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > > > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mercurial-devel mailing list > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
