On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:49:55 +0100, Boris Feld wrote: > I thought obsfateprinter was not dependent on the template system but I > was wrong. It doesn't seems too hard to make obsfate printer > independent of the templating system. > > Just checking that we are all on the same page, should we update the > current obsfateprinter to manually format and render an obsfate line?
Perhaps. Non-template version of obsfateprinter() will need to support translation, which isn't possible in templater. Also "obsfate" template will be replaced by a real template. > Or do we create another utility that is not template-dependent that > could also be called by changeset_printer? One utility function for both changeset_printer and hgweb if feasible. That said, hgweb might need a real template to embed hyperlinks. > Also, do we agree on the general format of obsfate as is it today? > > Obsfate: rewritten using amend as 2:fdf9bde5129a by test (at 1970- > 01-01 00:00 +0000) > Obsfate: rewritten using amend as 3:65b757b745b9 by test (at 1970- > 01-01 00:00 +0000) I have no preference on this. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
