durin42 accepted this revision.
durin42 added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> dlax wrote in rebase.py:667
> Why would that be nice? Do you foresee any problem?
> It just makes the code harder to follow, IMHO.
> 
> Besides, now the `rebase()` no longer has a docstring, meaning that help is 
> broken.

It's just a style thing. I find avoiding recursion to generally be clearer.

@phillco dlax is right, the docstring needs fixed here (I'm surprised tests 
passed...)

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1249

To: phillco, #hg-reviewers, durin42, dlax
Cc: dlax, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to