https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Bug ID: 5932
Summary: Hg clone using bundles is inneficient
Product: Mercurial
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: feature
Priority: wish
Component: clonebundles
Assignee: bugzi...@mercurial-scm.org
Reporter: wgianopou...@gmail.com
CC: mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
Before hg clone supported cloneing from bundles on the server, I was
downloading bundles and had me own clone procedure. I found after cloning
supported all of this I tried using it and found that especially under Windows,
cloning this way took substantially longer, so I went back to my former method.
I thought the issue had to do with poor network performance under Windows and
having the bundle locally stored was the difference, but then I noticed by
following the clone on on a hg clone on a server with bundles there is a
serious inefficiency compared to the way i was doing this. What I do is:
1. do the bundle thing
1. do a pull
3. do an update
what the hg clone from a server with bundles does is.
1. do the bundle thing
2. do an update
3. do a pull
4. do a second update
this takes longer and how much longer it takes depends on how may files are
changed moved or deleted by the pull.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
