pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in repository.py:22-24 > I'm not sure I understand what this says. > > The first sentence sounds too obvious to mention (kind of like "when it's > done, it should be working well"), but I suspect you mean something else. Do > you mean that that's the criteria for dropping the "exp-" prefix (much like > the comment for narrow says above)? > > I don't know what the second sentence says either. Isn't it already > generalized to shallow and ellipses? Yeah, the intent was to say the same thing as the comment about NARROW_REQUIREMENT says but re-reading myself, looks like I messed up. I will update this. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4810 To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers Cc: martinvonz, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
