On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 16:20:12 +0300, Pulkit Goyal wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> > > # Date 1544947726 -32400 > > # Sun Dec 16 17:08:46 2018 +0900 > > # Node ID 79dc95eb84b0f09a39fb396c65ec591f9f0de224 > > # Parent f1a69099327b6c3d92d2541fe8d40f8fe37a546e > > context: reimplement memfilectx.cmp() > > > > If I added a sanity check to basefilectx, test-context.py exploded. This > > patch copies the naive implementation from overlayworkingfilectx. > > > > Did you mean the whole series is for stable or just this patch?
1 for stable, and the others for default (once merged.) I didn't tried, but memfilectx.cmp() would crash if the other fctx had data of the same size. > And how did > you managed to put the STABLE flag on just one email and not rest? I want > to learn that trick. As I'm a templater guru, I just hacked it. --config patchbomb.flagtemplate='{ifeq(node|short, "<hash>", "STABLE")}' Not lovely. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel