yuja added a comment.

  >   I think it would be a good idea to make the "branch" arguments more 
flexible. One option could be to use a stringmatcher to add support for regular 
expressions as you suggest. I can look into that. However there may be some 
other options worth exploring. The one you suggest is very interesting although 
I find the syntax a bit complicated for the common use cases that I want to 
enable which are:
  >   
  >   1. Ignore merges from the same branch, which in a named-branch based 
branching strategy are usually irrelevant
  >   2. Look into merges with a specific branch (e.g. which branches have been 
merged with the default branch)?
  >   
  >   In my experience those two are the ones that are the most common and I 
think we should try to make the easy to use. That is, I think that even if 
mercurial had a filter function like the one you propose I would still want to 
be able to express those 2 common merge properties in a simple way.
  
  Yep, I agree with that.
  
  >   That being said, I really like your idea since I often find myself being 
unable to express what I want with a revset (as powerful as those are) because 
of the lack of a filtering mechanism. Adding a generic filter function would be 
very useful indeed. I'm not sure if the syntax you propose would work as is 
though. It seems that it would need a new "&" operator? In any case I believe 
that it is out of the scope of this particular set of patches. Do you agree?
  
  Yes. Actually I have a PoC-level implementation of generic filtering 
predicate,
  which can be reviewed separately.
  
  > If so I can focus on improving this patch by adding the stringmatcher as 
you suggest (as it seems I'm not the only one who thinks this would be useful). 
Is that ok?
  
  Sounds good to me. To be clear, I want `'withbranch'` instead of
  `'*withbranch'`, because the withbranch option doesn't look like a first-class
  parameter of the `merge()` predicate.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5495

To: angel.ezquerra, #hg-reviewers
Cc: pulkit, yuja, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to