On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:27 AM Pierre-Yves David < pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> > > On 4/17/19 3:18 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 03:49 Pierre-Yves David > > <pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org <mailto:pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org>> > > > wrote: > > > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.da...@octobus.net > > <mailto:pierre-yves.da...@octobus.net>> > > # Date 1555456341 -7200 > > # Wed Apr 17 01:12:21 2019 +0200 > > # Node ID 55bd98999c25b10e220477fd4cc446a7c9c1f8ca > > # Parent f233cb63bc077267d8571378350d9563cbabcf3d > > # EXP-Topic verify > > # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ > > # hg pull > > https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r 55bd98999c25 > > verify: introduce a notion of "level" > > > > > > I feel like this is unnecessarily complicated. It feels like just > > passing a boolean "full" would be enough. If one level has been enough > > for over ten years, it seems likely that two levels will be enough for > > many years ahead. Or do you plan to add more levels? > > I am planning to pass a "quick" mode that only check for stuff like > revlog size. > What about the revlog size would it check?
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel