JordiGH added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> valentin.gatienbaron wrote in localrepo.py:2658
> It'd be trivial to change the code to check both parents, but I find what you 
> say surprising. Aren't there plenty of places in hg that do checks similar to 
> this one:
> 
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-committed/file/3bc400ccbf99/mercurial/context.py#l443
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-committed/file/3bc400ccbf99/mercurial/context.py#l2414
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-committed/file/3bc400ccbf99/mercurial/localrepo.py#l2407

Hm, yes, you're right. I suppose it's a coincidence that a lot of things still 
work if p1 is null but p2 isn't. It's certainly not something that hg verify 
nor hg log complains about.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6613/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6613

To: valentin.gatienbaron, #hg-reviewers, mharbison72
Cc: JordiGH, yuja, mharbison72, martinvonz, mjpieters, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to