marmoute created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel. Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY Since we are only walking ancestors, it is safe to use an unfiltered repository. (Because if the original rev is not filtered, none of its ancestors will be). REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7501 AFFECTED FILES mercurial/context.py tests/test-repo-filters-tiptoe.t CHANGE DETAILS diff --git a/tests/test-repo-filters-tiptoe.t b/tests/test-repo-filters-tiptoe.t --- a/tests/test-repo-filters-tiptoe.t +++ b/tests/test-repo-filters-tiptoe.t @@ -136,13 +136,11 @@ - file with a single change $ hg annotate a - debug.filters: computing revision filter for "visible" 0: a - file with multiple change $ hg annotate z - debug.filters: computing revision filter for "visible" 0: some line 1: in a 2: file diff --git a/mercurial/context.py b/mercurial/context.py --- a/mercurial/context.py +++ b/mercurial/context.py @@ -1152,7 +1152,9 @@ # use linkrev to find the first changeset where self appeared base = self.introfilectx() if getattr(base, '_ancestrycontext', None) is None: - cl = self._repo.changelog + # it is safe to use an unfiltered repository here because we are + # walking ancestors only. + cl = self._repo.unfiltered().changelog if base.rev() is None: # wctx is not inclusive, but works because _ancestrycontext # is used to test filelog revisions To: marmoute, #hg-reviewers Cc: mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
