martinvonz added a comment.

  In D7591#111571 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7591#111571>, @rdamazio 
wrote:
  
  > In D7591#111570 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7591#111570>, @martinvonz 
wrote:
  >
  >> In D7591#111569 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7591#111569>, @rdamazio 
wrote:
  >>
  >>> FYI I'm going to send a chain that rewrites a lot of this
  >>
  >> To be clear, are you telling reviewers not to queue this one because you 
will be rewriting the *patch* or you're saying that you will later be sending 
patches on top of this one?
  >
  > I'm writing a larger change which includes this change, I don't mind 
merging the conflict if you want to go ahead and queue this.
  
  Okay, I think it makes sense to queue this one if it's just a subset of you 
changes.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7591/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7591

To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers
Cc: rdamazio, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to