martinvonz added a comment.

  In D7788#116756 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7788#116756>, @gracinet 
wrote:
  
  > @durin42 @martinvonz we might have a nice path forward with this, with the 
suggestion of @kevincox to make `Node` a truly defined type, not just an alias, 
with a private member for the bytes.
  
  Sounds good. I think I would have preferred that anyway.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7788/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7788

To: gracinet, #hg-reviewers, kevincox, martinvonz
Cc: martinvonz, durin42, kevincox, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to