Honestly > On Jan 24, 2020, at 11:29, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> > wrote: > > On 1/24/20 2:37 PM, Raphaël Gomès wrote: >> On 1/16/20 9:38 PM, Augie Fackler wrote: >>> I think overall that looks pretty good. Are you planning on making a >>> submission? >> Thanks for answer, sorry I took so long to get back to you. >> It seems like we agree on the broad strokes, so let's go ahead. > > The more I am thinking about it (helping Raphaël with the document), the more > I thinking that one of the most major roadblock we need to deal with is the > test suite. We have hundreds of thousand of line of test file all relying on > specific hash to be produced and consumed. We will need to design a good way > to express the used of different hash function in tests. Otherwise we won't > be able to seriously test the various hash using options.
Honestly I think I'd start by having a few small tests that exercise the basis with blake2b, then at some point we can set some tests to blake2b and some to sha1 and that'll be fine. > > (not saying we need to solve that right now, but I expect it to be a good > chunk of the initial work). > >> I am indeed planning on doing the aforementioned work for the submission. >> Here is the link to the public pad for everyone to contribute: >> https://mypads.framapad.org/mypads/?/mypads/group/octobus-public-5d3rw470w/pad/view/mercurial-nlnet-sha1-em1tk979r >> Note: I will be off Monday. >> _______________________________________________ >> Mercurial-devel mailing list >> Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org >> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > > -- > Pierre-Yves David > _______________________________________________ > Mercurial-devel mailing list > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
