marmoute added a comment.
In D7177#128389 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7177#128389>, @martinvonz wrote: > Maybe another option is to allow multiple `-d` arguments for this case? Something like `hg rebase -r C -d B -d D`. I haven't thought through BC, but I think that's what I'd prefer if we were writing rebase from scratch. I know we can't support `hg rebase -r C -d 'B + D'` for backward-compatibility reasons (because we already support that -- it rebases to the highest revnum in the set). That's interresting. How would that works with a practical case ? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7177/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7177 To: joerg.sonnenberger, martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, baymax Cc: mercurial-patches, marmoute, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
