>>> "MH" == Matt Harbison <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:35:20 -0500, Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 10:48:42 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> > Did you update the working copy of the DONE repo to some >> revision other >> > than null? The working copy should be empty after conversion. >> >> I did, but I think somehow the source repo is/was corrupt. > What does `hg verify` say when run on the source? The destination? > What does `hg -R /path/to/dest/repo log -r tip` say? If it doesn't > say this: > changeset: -1:000000000000 > user: > date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 But it does say this precisely!!! > ... then there's data in the destination. > The other possibility is that the filemap is wrong. The include > directive will only include files you ask for, and throws everything > else away. If the new commit would be empty after doing that, it > throws the commit away. I'm a little fuzzy on what you wrote- "Now > Repo1 contains a repo". If that's the case, I don't think you should > have "Repo1" in the filemap- > try it with paths relative to the root of the repository. Thanks! Ok will do. I recall I add problems when I used relative path, at least that is what the README file, I wrote back then, says
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list [email protected] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
