David Demelier <[email protected]> writes: >> I've been stubbornly sticking with hg for hobby projects, but I almost never >> encounter anything other than git in the open source and commercial worlds. >> (I'm aware that hg is used in both, but this is a rare exception.) hg seems >> to be going very much in the direction of bzr, although we're clearly not >> there yet. > > It's not because everybody use Git that everyone else should have to do. > There are still popular projects using Mercurial or even > subversion/cvs/fossil. Git benefits from GitHub being unfortunately > de-facto opensource hub. Not Mercurial's fault.
At work we’re using git, but it’s rare that a month goes by where I don’t comment "this would be a no-brainer with hg", when someone loses half an hour of work again to git. So I still see a lot of options for hg, and for my own projects I stick to it. For git projects I use either git (if they are big or use subrepos or so security critical that I sign the commits) or hg-git (for smaller repos). Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list [email protected] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
