On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 02:26:00 +0200, Manuel Jacob wrote: > Superficially, it seems to me like the amount of work to finish the > relevant parts of the Windows UTF-8 plan and the amount of work to > update the fixutf8 extension is comparable. > > As a TortoiseHG developer, do you see any problem in supporting the > approach described in the Windows UTF-8 plan in TortoiseHG (both in the > application and in the shell extension)?
TortoiseHg runs on top of Mercurial. It does nothing about the repository storage where Unicode API has to be used on Windows. _______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list [email protected] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
