>>> "MM" == Malcolm Matalka <[email protected]> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> writes: >> > On 2019-08-25 11:39, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> > Hg-git can do it. When converting from HG to Git, the branch name >> > will be noted in the "--HG--" section. When converting back from Git >> > to HG, the branch name will be restored. >> >> This is really great (and would explain, why I cannot see the full graph >> in helix nor in sourcehut) > Why does it explain that? sourcehut is not storing hg repos in git > under the hood. I never claimed that (I should have used «could» instead of «would». Ludovic conjectured that helix uses a plugin. I thought that is impossible because of named branches. Manuel told me that the hg-git plugin somehow can deal with named branches, which I still was not able to verify. I noticed that both helix and sourcehut don't offer hg log -G (Which I really miss). So I thought one possible explanation is that they really can't because they use the plugin. _______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list [email protected] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
