>> Why factors prime95 only up to 59 bit at exponnent which are for
>> doublechecking?
>>
>> The other (9million) are up to 62 bit.
>>
>> Why is that so?
> Because the large the number, the more factoring is worth doing before
> changing over to the computationally expensive LL test.
I had wondered if it wouldn't be worthwhile to run additional factoring
tests on the smaller exponents, taking them up to 62bit (or more) factoring,
see if we can't find any factors of those numbers that are sitting between
~59bit and ~62bit...just for fun.
Aaron
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
