At 01:23 AM 6/23/99 -0400, Chris Nash wrote:
>x however is very rarely much smaller than p-1 - I'll leave a full analysis
>to others, but typically you'll see (p-1), (p-1)/2, maybe a few others, but
>rarely much smaller.
That's right.
+----------------------------------------------+
| Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |
+----------------------------------------------+
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
