To: Jud McCranie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks.. I have read some of the mail that followed the ones I quoted and seen that you corrected that. Sincerely speaking I would have preferred you to be right and me to be wrong. I believe that "proofs are neat things"(tm) and would have jumped to the place where it was announced, in no time... R R Jud McCranie wrote: >. At 11:52 AM 7/8/99 -0700, Rudy Ruiz wrote: > > >I am not aware that anyone has yet proven the infinitude of > >Sophie Germain Primes. [Granted that, in itself, does not mean > >anything ;) >I was wrong. As far as I know, it hasn't been proven either >(but it is almost certainly true). I had seen a conjectured >distribution function that went to infinity, but it has not >been proven. > > +----------------------------------------------+ > | Jud "program first and think later" McCranie | > +----------------------------------------------+ ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
