At 01:55 PM 10/14/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The results were the usual statistical double-talk... e.g. "There is not
enough evidence to suggest that the (logarithmic) gaps do *not* follow a
Poisson distribution".
That's not double-talk - that's the way the process works.
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Jud McCranie |
| |
| Programming Achieved with Structure, Clarity, And Logic |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
