At 03:26 PM 5/12/2001 -0400, Nathan Russell wrote:
I think that's more of a 'quick fix', and might make new participants
>feel that GIMPS doesn't trust them.

Yes, but a new user need not know that they don't get an exponent that has 
expired until they have finished an assignment.  My point is that if an 
exponent is dropped, it could be reassigned to someone that has shown a 
willingness to finish it.

I've been steadily working on GIMPS for nearly 5 years, always 1 fulltime 
machine, occasionally 2.  I've been doing doublechecks in the 6,000,000 
range for a few months because I use a 300 MHz machine.  I know 
doublechecking is important.  But then I see these few gaps under M38? and 
I think "I could have done several of those."  I know there are going to be 
a lot of people who start GIMPS and drop it, and I know that that the gaps 
will eventually be filled in.

_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to