The reason is quiet simple: SETI is successful and GIMPS is not.

Don't worry, SETI junks million of CPU years while GIMPS solve
complex math. problems (8


>Yes the article does go into great detail re Beowulf clusters, but the
>penultimate paragraph contains:
>
>"An equally important trend is the development of networks of PCs that
>contribute their processing power to a collective task. An example is
>SETI@home, ..."
>
>As usual, we get ignored while SETI gets all the publicity.


_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to