I think it is better to use the P4 setting (if you can) because you have 
the advantage of the SSE and the faster FPU 8)

Greets,
Mohk

PS: It should be easy to hack the code to enable the P4 setting, just skip 
the CPU detection ;)

At 01:54 11/21/2001, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>I looked but hadn't found how an AMD XP 1600+ should identify itself 
>within Prime95. It calls the processor a Cyrix 6x86 running at 144 MHz 
>when it is running on a 1400 MHz motherboard. I set it to an Athlon at 
>1400 and it passed the torture tests and seems to work, but are the 
>settings correct for an AMD XP 1600+?
>
>Also, will the Prime95 FFT be recoded to take advantage of the AMD SSE2 
>instructions like it was for the P4?
>
>Regards,
>
>-Allan
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm
>Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to