I think it is better to use the P4 setting (if you can) because you have the advantage of the SSE and the faster FPU 8)
Greets, Mohk PS: It should be easy to hack the code to enable the P4 setting, just skip the CPU detection ;) At 01:54 11/21/2001, you wrote: >Hi Folks, > >I looked but hadn't found how an AMD XP 1600+ should identify itself >within Prime95. It calls the processor a Cyrix 6x86 running at 144 MHz >when it is running on a 1400 MHz motherboard. I set it to an Athlon at >1400 and it passed the torture tests and seems to work, but are the >settings correct for an AMD XP 1600+? > >Also, will the Prime95 FFT be recoded to take advantage of the AMD SSE2 >instructions like it was for the P4? > >Regards, > >-Allan > >_________________________________________________________________________ >Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm >Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers