Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the assembler produces thousands of messages like this:
> >
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1010: Error: Junk `(3)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1011: Error: Junk `(0)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1012: Error: Junk `(1)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1013: Error: Junk `(0)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1014: Error: Junk `(0)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1015: Error: Junk `(0)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1017: Error: Junk `(3)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1019: Error: Junk `(2)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1021: Error: Junk `(1)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1023: Error: Junk `(3)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1026: Error: Junk `(2)' after register
> > /tmp/ccvNmrri.s:1029: Error: Junk `(1)' after register
> >
> > leading me to wonder, which assembler should one use to compile mesa?
> > currently we're using nasm .98 / gcc -2.95.2
>
> I've used stock RedHat 6.0/6.1 with success. RH 6.1 has gcc 2.91.66
> and as 2.9.1.
I have a workaround for this problem. I'll commit it sometime today.
BTW, will Mesa 3.2 be released or are we going straight to 3.4?
Josh
_______________________________________________
Mesa-bug maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.mesa3d.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-bug
_______________________________________________
Mesa-dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.mesa3d.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
