Christian König [2011-01-13 23:15]: > i just pushed a rework of the literal handling in r600g to master. > This rework replaces/extends your patch with a (hopefully) more general > resolution to the problem. > > I have tested my patch quite a bit, but currently don't have a good test > case at hand for the SIN/COS/SCS functions. I assume that since your > patch was committed just two days ago that you have a good code example > which doesn't worked before this patch.
My patch fixed the "SIN test", "COS test" and "SCS test" of glean's fragProg1 (as included in piglit). > Could you test this again and see if your fix is still working? Yes, the tests still pass. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpZOpnABgyDj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
