On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Denis Oliver Kropp <d...@directfb.org> wrote: > On 13/03/11 08:09, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Denis Oliver Kropp <d...@directfb.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> thanks to all of you who contributed to Mesa/DRM/KMS. >>> >>> Following are some benchmark results of the new DirectFB on Mesa port. >>> >>> The code is checked into git.directfb.org now. >>> >>> >>> I also think I know how to map the buffers now (see my previous mails), >>> using intel specific ioctl (as in libkms bo_map) with the handle returned by >>> eglExportDRMImageMESA. >>> >> >> I don't know the right answer, but that isn't it. You really don't >> want to be using libkms at all >> for that use case I don't think. libkms buffers aren't meant to be >> used in acceleration situations. > > Right, I'm not going to use libkms. > > I'll stay with the Mesa based allocation, but thought I can map the bo > similar to how it is done in libkms' bo_map implementation for intel:
You should probably use libdrm_intel I'm not following the architecture of what you are doing though, if directfb has a loadable per-gpu driver that isn't mesa etc. Maybe krh or olv will answer on how these things work. Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev