On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com> > > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/utils.c | 5 ++--- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/utils.h | 2 +- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i810/i810context.c | 4 +--- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.c | 6 +----- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/mach64/mach64_dd.c | 5 +---- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/mga/mgadd.c | 4 ---- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nouveau_driver.c | 2 +- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nouveau_driver.h | 1 - > src/mesa/drivers/dri/r128/r128_dd.c | 6 +----- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_context.c | 5 +---- > .../drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_common_context.c | 5 +---- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_context.c | 2 -- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/savage/savagedd.c | 4 +--- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/sis/sis_dd.c | 4 +--- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/tdfx/tdfx_dd.c | 5 +---- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/unichrome/via_context.c | 4 +--- > 16 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) >
Turns out there was a bit of fallout from this in kwin, specifically the intel portion that was pushed to the stable branch in b0a7492aebeb4517346f0da2362d6991a7385b59. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270942 Also, at one point they actually used the driver date in their blacklists, I'm not sure if they are still doing that though. -Robert _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev