On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Chia-I Wu <olva...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why not to use egl_dri2 for all drivers, the classic and gallium ones? >> >> Why not to build a single fully-replaceable binary for a driver, like >> classic swrast_dri.so can be replaced by swrastg_dri.so from Gallium? >> Like radeon_drv.so from xf86-video-ati can be replaced by r300_drv.so >> from Gallium? >> >> I thought it had been agreed long ago that Gallium is a private >> unstable interface inside drivers and shouldn't be exposed publicly in >> any way. With that, I see no reason for egl_gallium.so to exist. > egl_gallium supports OpenVG and some EGL extensions not supported by > egl_dri2. SCons's build of egl_gallium does not expose any internal > interface. I can(/should have) adjust autoconf-based build not to > too.
OK, I didn't know about that. > > Maybe we can have egl_dri2 enabled and egl_gallium disabled when > --enable-egl, and has the option to enable egl_gallium? Then maybe > have --enable-openvg depend on egl_gallium? Sounds good. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
